29th August, 2010: The
now-defunct “News of the World” news agency published allegations that three
members of the Pakistan cricket squad touring England that summer had been
approached by a bookie, who paid them hefty amounts of money to bowl certain
“deliveries” at certain stages of the match. Mohammad Amir, an evolving youth
in Darwin’s world of cricket, was accused along with his opening partner
Mohammad Asif of bowling no-balls during the exact stages of the match. The
third member of the trio, the team’s newly appointed captain, Salman Butt,
(riding high on his endeavours in his debut series as captain against
Australia) politely refuted the claims in the press conference that followed
the day’s play. “I have no knowledge of the claims", he explained, “The
Pakistan team has always been a recipient of ridicule. I’m surprised it has
gone so far this time”.
Pakistan lost the test
match, the fourth of the series, by a mammoth innings and 225 runs. The
management looked into the allegations and decided to drop the three from the
remaining tour, consisting of two T20 matches and five ODIs.
Now, as revelling the
controversy might be, it is, however, very necessary to recall the events of
the entire match, not just for the sake of judgement but also to highlight the
contrasting features of the game – the astonishing “ups” and the disgraceful
“downs”.
26th August, 2010:
Having already lost the series, Salman Butt rightly elected to bowl on a pitch
that had a bit of moisture as well as a tinge of green. His bowling attack
consisted of a potent mixture of fresh blood and wily, experienced seam.
Mohammad Asif was fresh out of his drugs ban, and two new faces in the
Pakistani bowling line up were creating headlines, specially Mohammad Amir.
Just 17 then, The Guardian touted him as the next best thing since Akram.
However a soggy outfield, lashed with overnight rain, meant a delayed start for
the players and early lunch. Play started post-lunch, and Amir bowled as Ian
Botham pointed out, a fairly “indiscipline” no-ball. Asif, too, gave away an
useless run when he stepped over “massively”, on the sixth delivery in the
tenth over. Pretty usual it seemed. Strauss was cleaned up by an in-swinging
peach from Asif, but the light was offered to the batsmen after just 12.3
overs, prematurely ending the day’s play.
27th & 28th August
: England resumed play and Mohammad Amir carried on his good form that summer,
zooming through a meek English defence, with Cook, Pietersen, Collingwood and
England’s new star migrant, Morgan, all becoming scape goats to the swinging
southpaw, the last three falling for nought. England 5 for 47 runs and in a
heap of trouble. Prior stuck out nearly 2 and a half hours, facing over a 100
deliveries for his hard earned 22, and a critical 50 run stand with another RSA
batsman, Trott, before he edged out to Amir. Swann came in, saw the weather,
had a chat with the umpire and was sent for an early tea by Amir. He fell to a
first ball duck. England were now staring at the barrel at 7 for 102 and for
once, Butt was controlling proceedings in the series. In walked Stuart Broad,
with all of his father’s height (and a bit more perhaps) and was only a novice
with the bat then, having just scored one test match fifty. What followed was a
partnership that redefined tail-end batting, as well as the record books,
dwarfing (ironically) a sixteen-year old Pakistan feat, in which Wasim Akram
and Saqlain Mushtaq put on 313 for the 8th wicket against a listless Zimbabwean
attack, where Akram made a record 257 n.o. hitting 12 sixes in the process, a
feat that hasn’t been eclipsed as yet.
Trott and Broad put on
a gigantic 332 run partnership, batting for nearly 95 overs and deep into day
three, to sway the game away from Pakistan. Both scored hundreds as England
finished with 446 on the board. Amir did, however, claim a six-wicket haul.
They then, skittled out Pakistan for a meagre and embarrassing 74 runs, and
41/4 at the close of the third day’s play.
29th August: England
rounded off an emphatic innings victory by clearing out the Pakistan batting
stronghold for just over a hundred runs. Stuart Broad claimed the Man of the
Match medal for his heroics with the bat while, Mohammad Amir claimed the Man
of the Series (Pakistan) title for his 19 wickets.
What followed was no
less than perhaps a nightmare for the teenager who hadn’t even received his
driving license. The tabloid broke the news of the scam and the trio was banned
effectively, after being judged on later findings. Wisden magazine had named
Mohammad Amir in its issue of the top five cricketers for the summer. They
changed their cover as soon as the story leaked, and for the first time
published a “four-man” cover-story. Natwest nearly stripped Amir of his medal,
but allowed it later on.
It was a test match
that had it all; brilliant bowling, pathetic batting, heroes were born,
villains emerged and a talismanic bowler was stained at the hands of the very
man he trusted, his captain. Pakistan has always been touted as the
controversial child of international cricket. Now that its corrupt scope has
reached out to further avenues, we are left with a question: How do we see it
as a cricket fanatic? For every time a Pakistani cricketer puts his hand into
his pockets, you wonder whether he might actually be tampering the ball. On one
hand the decision reached by the British court will serve as a reminder that
the game will never tolerate corruption, but it also shows us that every player
is not an Indian or an English cricketer, who enjoys superstar-dome and is well
paid. ICC should be patted for its action as well as pin-pointed for for not
allowing a fair and reasonable cap on the salary of players for the matches
they represent their country in.
Moreover, it is our
duty as spectators to choose the right conclusion. For me, Pakistan still
remains the epitome of fast bowlers. The land of the Sultans of swing, the
Handsome Pathan or the feisty Miandad, will never stop producing proud sporting
moments for itself as well as for cricket. It is the current crop of players
who are responsible for setting perfect examples for the brooding youngsters
back home. It is rightly said that if India produces a Tendulkar-esque to smash
it all over the park, Pakistan will definitely produce an Akram, trying to
clean him up!
The twist and turn of
this team is surely turbulent, but I’m sure it will be well defended. After
all, it has to be proven, specifically, within the 22 yards.
No comments:
Post a Comment